Weigh In or Way Out?

This is just to note that I have not weighed in on Cheney's Putter, the Golf War Dis-aster(sp!). Nor might* I way out on the recent SCOTUS nomination.

* Normite(sp!) not applicable, but I have aster risked the hints...not exactly.

[We've come a long way Katy! Pardon the innuendo**, but from Oil welfare rich Alaska to VP candidate to BP and back, I mean really... ]

** seriously I allude to the three women from politician to journalist and potential jurist, but there is caveat of commity* in word play.) (Is there a commity* network?)

[No! I did not know that.] Hint: Johnny or Jay Walker?] SNL?

[update: Not exactly! Tangent or See Can't or just Penn Station?

*[5-17-10] spell check (sp?!) legend: as intended? OK! In this case, alright.
In other cases (sp!) as intended, (sp!?) maybe more than one intention?
aka: no pun intended, or was there? This is a long narrative to say I don't intend to correct the unintended misspell, as in other minds it may mean something. But my intention was to insert the caveat channel.

GAZA FLOTILLA

Not to be definitive nor endorsing aside(sp!),
that in itself may draw a conclusion**,
there is much too* understand
it seems.

* that & also(sp!) which
** not even within the following aside[Although this is no trivial pursuit, there is much "hard work".]
[Politics is harder work.]

Many Key an ism?

Deepak Chopra[**]: On Profit Beck* and Duelism.(sp!)

*(sp!) I can't check all puns(or misspells)

[See comment and added footnotes: Manichean ]

[**] Deepak Chopra is in last segment.

Ian Bremmer

Format TBA
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlJ80wMRhwU&t=637s

washingtonnote.com/ian_bremer_mikh/



https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2513647175
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5781634930001/?#sp=show-clips
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaZznwvDil0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq1fT9R7vnc

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trumps-immigration-push-a-window-into-his-follow-through/ar-AAz5Zv2?ocid=spartanntp

https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=us+vs+them+ian+bremmer&tag=mh0b-20&index=aps&hvadid=77653060188821&hvqmt=b&hvbmt=bb&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_288ek5w6tf_b

Retro-Gate

Iran-Contra, WMD, October No-Surprise.

Not to preemptively prophet[!]
Not to bring back the draft,
but here are some posts held in draft.

Update: Muffin Gate: Miff In Gate


Pulled from draft today!
[Oops, a bit redundant]
Great Ledership
It's Mad[!]

[!] = sarcasm / spelling as intended = [sp!]
Close enough for journal work?

[10-3-11 Just to be clear, I believe in nuance and the law, but as different fields. What I can't say is that I am clearly satire, but the field might be mis-ledership***. But not to coin a new field, here are some other* perspectives, not to say they are the same field. (two video, two scroll overs)

*after the break: Stewart on NRA / teaching** to the test? NOT!]
** speaking of headings*** or retro
*** footnote to clarify later:
moral economics(INET/Robert Reich)& even later
BTW: sub-heading(Just to be clear...) I did not mean to wind-up a G'Ribble, but you can't judge a target by its aim, fear-mongers need a boogie-man. Aims are directions not bulls-eyes.

Definition: G'Ribble- grand ribbing and riddle

[*4] Ratigan and Perugia: processes

Missing thought

I am still trying to recover thought B, of labor day weak*. But it could be that I hit it already. The Bush tax cuts have failed to provide the jobs they were intended to, and they add to the debt. If this is not clear, there is big job market for people who think they know better.(sarcasm) BTW: war is a cost(Peace is an investment.)
[*italics indicate intentional spelling(missing sarcasm noted? sp! or sic = sarcasm in context)]

Index 9-21-11 (B)

Note Anachronism:
(B-time=8:07)for flip flop of vision thing,
or perspective on index and archive sequence.
Link below indicates mo'real time.

The Team? or[!] [DBA]
Randi Rhodes
Lawrence[*] O'Donnell
Stephanie Miller
Thom Hartmann
Ed Schultz[Update 9-23-11]
Norman Gold-Man
Thom Hartmann

The Music?
ACTUALLY THE G'Ribble?(a test of search/index slash references)***
G'Ribble
Back to The "One Thing".
Place Holder?
Who needs Brackets?
The Honeymoon is Over?
What's so funny...
The Straw Bear
"Trust but Verify"
QCON:Truthout
Proof of Process
MOORE TRUTH IN MEDIA
The G'Ribble?
Actually I end in pun(Or rather Satire), but this was a text* of sorts(literally), of "G'Ribble" in the (Blogspot)Search Box in the upper left corner of this blog.

It was a test in two ways. To see if there is any reliability of the search engine over time. Of course editing would influence that accuracy. But also to see if there was any mess age above and beyond the search, in the calm pend I um**.

*(sp!) typo/ra test [?]ra=read as[!]
** see test/text/time/tangent not to mention T(t)ruth.
*** Grand Ribble: Whereas D'Ribble might be obvious, it is not so simple. It might be a de-ribble or an un-ribble, or a Democratic Ribble, which seems like hard work, now that I think about it, but never(that I can tell) just trickle-down.

[*]bingo "that's not smart, it's not right"

If Only It Were Black and White.

Now don't read between the lines*.
SIN comes in all peoples. (Shift, Ignore, Name call)

[note: anachronism** and update, labels and links]

* caution language: not rated for sensitive hearts
(not to mention subject matters) Crtl F: "vote"

[Please note this was not meant to be such a challenge. The only thing black and white is a vote, and sometimes even that is questionable. But the underlying current is that the two parties are incomparable, but that does not stop people from choosing tents or not even entering them. The point is, what the "F" are people thinking when they are voting? Well, they may have left their sinking ship of the right and will proceed to dilute and delude the left.]

** not to mention acornyms(sp!): Strength in Numbers? Sea challenge[!]
[There was an embedded point on strength and ** was not it(but there is a hint in the labels or scroll over).]

[I almost inserted an image, but can't find the right place to put it, maybe this is where it fits.]

[Follow up or down. i.e. Bottom links represent actual sequences(hopefully), they have been adjusted for the sake of format.]
[But hold your horses.]

[BTW***: this was not intended as a Halloween special. WC/RC/SC...Warner/Chamblis?]
*** Brian "Tangent" Williams [If only...]

Slash Segue

Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.

*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor

---

For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?

**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"

*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]

Of Course Correction

Not to pun on the rock.
But I have been fishing** in the Salish Sea.
Knot that Strait [!]*

* speaking of plot lines, the bold and the but if ul, inserted last.
i.e. The Atlantic(Strait) was not read at the time of the line, and the Washington Post(But) not even yet.
**Roger that.

[Breaking***: AM - PC RC ! ]
***(9-20-13) Not certain this is the piece. But 2014 is the point in the House.

FOOTNOTES(March 2013) Page 3

3-14-13 {?} oar? A.Conservative Foray (4A) (sc),  B. Rocket Man?[!] C. FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012 (Sp?), D. HiTetra! , E. Rest in Peace: Andrew Breitbart , F. Primary Boogeyman , G. A Shot in the Arm? , H. 4A (sc), I. The Lost Obama (sc), J. Oh, what a web... , K.Vy Not? I'll Tell You Vy! (sc),  L. Allegory (4A) (sc)

3-20-13 Pardon My Hume or Ism.  Economics is about balancing the rock, paper, scissors 4moolahs (a,b) and wack-a-mole of charts.

3-22-13 (FP2) *Ctrl F(leverage)&(b.s.): A, b, C(c), d, E, F, G(g), H(h), I(i), J(j), K.

Not that I'm saying...

Steve Clemons on The Exit Strategy.
Nor was the Ribble of Ctrl F preemptive.

But I did say something close.
[Or Circumspective(sp?!)]
[Breaking news 10:40 AM PST: McCrystal replaced by Petraeus.]

Cropping the News?

The Daily Show Lewis Black cedes Beck.
The Colbert Report Colbert routes FOX.
Some weep what they so**.
Sow check* your crop.

*thanks to Casey Kasem
** and some misspell
[updates: 5-17-10 Commity(sp?!), Charlie Rich?, the Free*** Market?, Re;-)sources?(Comity Label added)]

*** non-value or non-prophet

Change Logos

There were a couple issues that I seem to have been recently premptive** on, which Chris Hayes* seems to have intersected.  Actually in regard to changes, it was in regard to the tetrahedron.  Speaking of aster risks ...  I could work on mine.

Nevertheless here is the Awkward Tan / Gent***:

Facetious Replacement Logo:  The Washington UV's.  The Un-Vespuccians. 

In a related matter in line with Hume or ... !

 

*'n MSNBC
** to list later
*** (which I did not go All In with) /At least to the point of sharing on facebook.
[Last item was found on my desktop dated March 10th.]

... or whose? 

Anachronistic

Post Bubble War Economics
Congressional investigations into the economy have been limited to 2008 to more recent, but should be looking a bit further back. Concerns were leaking* into 2007.
*but it is not about me (Ouch//touche? The anachronism that(or which) is.
[Bottom Line: the economy in crisis link pre-dates the investigations at least, let alone Business Weak(Sp!).]

Educat or

Beck:
Keith Olberman brought this to light. My original concern was that Beck was so loose in his grammar or rhetoric that some misinterpretation was almost inescapable(indeed prophetic and not for profit).

It turns out he was even loose with his script. As I transcribed the video from Countdown:

Beck: Jesus conquered death, he wasn’t victimized he chose to give his life, he did have a choice. If he was a victim and this theology was true, then Jesus would have come back from the dead and made the Jews pay for what they did. That’s an abomination.

As his blog scripted it:

This is kind of complex, because Jesus did identify with the victims. But Jesus wasn't a victim, he was a conqueror. Jesus conquered death. He chose to give his life. Jesus didn't come back from the dead and make the Jews pay for what they did. That would have been an abomination.

As a Norman Goldman caller called it: 32:45 to 35:47 or more...
Not that there are soul* interpretations, but there are several that say Judas did pay, in fact possibly to the potter's field.

*floundering mispelling intended

[Speaking of Shakespeare, I must admit to occasional spelling errors myself, but sometimes they are profitic.(Sp!)]
[Thank You CBS: And for refudiating Bush and English while Obama doesn't need a pardon.]
[Not to mention, thank you Sarah Palin for trickling down the language, whild Obama cleans it up, literally.][Not to mention founding words and living constitutions.]

Catch-22?

Or welcome to the Rat Race?

The actual trap.

Fair and balanced?

Liberal reticence an oxymoron?

The new Rat Trap?

Catch-44 rebound ed?

The real catch?

(And some missed.)

Fairly Rube Goldburg.*

*sp![Ctrl F(sic) if not SB ?]

[Bold fully read. Rat Trap in the "balanced". The "real catch" is the timing.]

[No mas, no pun, no gain]

[Breaking: not exactly ?]

[To say the least.]

[See updates]

N-oddly Enough...

[7-17-11 updating in progress]

I intend to expound upon the derivative-lined analogy(see Hint there).
To begin with, I had expounded upon the Murdoch troubles and 'N NPR report on my way into the NWRoots Conference. The NPR report had noted that Murdoch had influence, but it was not necessarily what made the difference in** elections in the light of his selecting a winner, not making a winner, and that it was more about money(power) than ideology(which needs more light or shading). Warren Buffet reflects some of this area that I 4shadow or shame. And Maher's remarks almost bring to color the ironic balance of logic.

Hint: 'N = not (also "an"*)

















Math: 'N X N = 4 = GPS [!]= ...
Or is it Not^3=Oh[!]

* & is '4 a sine or cosine?
[footnote: Segue /'N Horsey 'Nadir]

[7-17-11 'Nconsistency ofor whichcraft[sp!].]


** correction "in" added 12-16-11 found in Pun on Tangent/Sine/Cosine

FOOTNOTES PAGE NOVEMBER 2013

11-1-13 "Obama" "Right" NFRY Under X-tent of AMC.
11-3-13 "Kant we all..." in draft

11-5-13: A. this page, B. 11-1, D. (b.s.) of Kant Hegel Mill(sic), C. Connecting the Dots (let alone Hume or...)
11-6-13: "Un-curving" (b.s.) // 4-15-12 V for Victim, 3-9-11 The Curve or Nuance Thing, 6-23-11 Over Helming., 6-29-09  Voodoo Economics Redux? , 10-19-10  Debt and Tax Cuts, , 7-29-10  Economic Reform., 10-14-13 Government Hostage, 7-1-13 (FP2), 3-3-11 The one thing?,(back to post) 6-29-11 Caging Godzillas 

11-9-13 further unembedding 

11-21-13 Progress is problematic. So is reading. This is not too spoiler alert or pun, but I was glad to read the former and there is more to the ladder.

11-24-13 Fortunate (b.s.) Jumping the Shark?,  To be determined*, Meta PI, To Filter, E.(sc), Tacky, tact, tack..., Rubric's Peek, WikiLeaks’ Paul Ryan exposure, I. Over Helming. J. Odyssey Dawn , K. Historic Health Care Bill Passed,{under glass}, Who the heck..., M. Flip-Flopper-Crafting , N. CONnecting the . . .   anomalic searching? ePH'n ponder? Conservative Foray (4A) (speaking of search) (R C under MNoh?) (FP2)

Yikes! 3.0

[Posted 2-7-11 PM]

I won't track the first two,(or last two here- or 4 ) but here is a back log of leaps.
Allow me to preface by saying that Rush Limbaugh is no* Glenn Beck, not to mention vice verses(sp!)...well...I don't know about that. But my the leap is not a vicious cycle or a virtuous cycle but a patronizing childish cycle.
And where is my leap? The Chomsky crack. And back to the future. These latter certainly need sorting.

* they have different formats and resources

[Christopher Hedges' language is too complex to un-nuance. Michael Sandel may need a second look. I have not finished either of these sources at this point.]